Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs, 298 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc, 281 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
26.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
215/60 R17 96H, 225/50 R18 95H
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1565 mm / 61.6 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4390 mm / 172.8 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
42%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good engine reliability
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- Impractical
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.