CrossoverAudi32% by Neofiliac Team56% by External Reviewers

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Subcompact Crossover

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 1of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 2of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 3of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 4of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 5of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 6of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 7of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Photo 8of Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Product Overview

Audi Q3 Sportback (Typ F3) is a subcompact crossover in production from 2019. It is available with a range of inline-4 engines that displaced 1.4 to 2.0 liters.
The hunchback version of the F3 Audi Q3, the Sportback is less practical and uglier. Still, some consumers got tricked into thinking that it is a good choice.
The official fuel economy rating is exceptionally rosy, though it may cast more doubts on the trustworthiness of the regulators and perhaps the owner's own sanity than it relates to reality.
Drivers who appreciate handling should keep in mind that the Audi Q3 Sportback uses MacPherson front suspension, which doesn't provide the best cornering performance.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 32%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

What external reviewers found

External score 56%
Pros
  • Excellent infotainment system
  • Comfortable to drive
  • Sleek looks
Cons
  • Lack of practicality
  • Not as practical as the standard Q3
  • Not as comfortable as the Q3 SUV
  • No manual transmission
  • Slightly less roomy than Q3

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Related Products

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
· 27%
Audi Q3 F3
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
· 37%
Jaguar E-Pace facelift
  • Low fuel consumption
· 35%
Kia Sportage 2 (JE/KM)
  • Not much
· 15%
Audi Q2 (GA)
  • Decent 4-cylinder engines
· 28%
Audi Q3 (8U) facelift
  • Relatively reliable engines
  • Some towing capacity
· 33%
Mini Countryman F60
  • Improved styling
  • Improved engine reliability
· 26%
BMW X2 F39
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 34%
BMW X1 F48 LCI
  • Looks like the original X1
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 36%
Nissan Juke (F15)
  • So ugly it's endearing
· 6%
Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
· 29%
Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 34%

Related Articles

Audi RS Models: How Are They Set Apart from Other Variants in the Same Series?
Audi Sport GmhH manufactures RS models that represent the pinnacle of each respective series in Audi's expanding lineup. Each combines everyday usability with characteristic RS design and performance. Let's look at how Audi designs, develops, tests, an...
26 May 2020

External Reviews

autoexpress[1]

Reviewer score 60% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from autoexpress have found:
The Sportback is 29mm lower than the Q3 SUV, but 16mm longer, resulting in a slightly extended boot floor. The overall look isn't as clumsy as other coupe SUVs, but it's arguably not as distinctive as the X2. Legroom, like in the standard Q3, is above average for the class. A sliding rear bench allows for up to 130mm of movement if more storage space is required.
Pros
  • Comfortable to drive
  • Decent infotainment system
Cons
  • Not as practical as the standard Q3
  • Not as comfortable as the Q3 SUV

carmagazine[2]

Reviewer score 54% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from carmagazine have found:
The latest member of the Q3 range has a 49mm lower roofline than its sibling – that's sufficiently coupe-like in our book – as well as being 6mm narrower and 16mm longer. Material and build quality are hard to fault, while there's plenty of tactile delight, with squidgy slush-mouldings, glossy surfaces and even fillets of Alcantara to caress. There's barely a deficit in bootspace for opting for the more rakish Q3 either.
Pros
  • Roomier and more practical than the Q3
  • Sleek looks
Cons
  • Slightly less roomy than Q3

References

  1. ^ New Audi Q3 Sportback 2019 review. [autoexpress].
  2. ^ Audi Q3 Sportback (2019) review: vanilla – with a Flake. [carmagazine].

<

>

x