CrossoverVolvo Cars57% by Neofiliac Team68% by External Reviewers

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Compact Crossover

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Photo 1of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Photo 2of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Photo 3of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Photo 4of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Photo 5of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Photo 6of Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Product Overview

Volvo XC60 II (chassis code SPA) is a compact crossover in production from 2017 to 2020, whereupon it received a facelift. It was available with a range of inline-4 engines that displaced 2.0 liters.
With this generation, Volvo has gone fully into the one-engine, multiple output route. Unfortunately, this has led to wide reports of engine-related issues, largely due to the high stress that the "efficient" engines have to go through.
The plug-in hybrid drivetrain can help the owner save on fuel and car tax, though those who plan on keeping the car after warranty should be mindful of the complexity. Its official fuel economy rating is exceptionally rosy, though it may cast more doubts on the trustworthiness of the regulators and perhaps the owner's own sanity than it relates to reality.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 57%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense

What external reviewers found

External score 68%
Pros
  • Superb interior
  • Decent performance
  • Excellent infotainment system
  • Impressive battery life
Cons
  • Poor fuel economy
  • Lack of practicality
  • Lacklustre navigation
  • Lack of refinement
  • Lackluster performance

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar

Related Products

Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to purchase
· 17%
Hyundai Tucson 4 (NX)
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Some towing capacity
· 31%
Audi Q5 (8R) facelift
  • Improved engine output
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
· 49%
BMW X3 G01
  • Superb B-series engine lineup
  • Much improved reliability
  • Some offroad capabilities
...
· 70%
BMW X4 G02
  • Superb B58/B48/B57/B47 engines
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
· 55%
Volkswagen Tiguan (5N) facelift
  • Some offroad capabilities
· 34%
Volkswagen Tiguan (5N)
  • Some offroad capabilities
· 28%
Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift
  • Decent engines
  • Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
· 19%
Toyota RAV4 III (XA30)
  • High level of reliability
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Small turning circle
...
· 41%
Audi Q5 II (FY/80A) facelift
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
· 56%
Audi Q5 Sportback (FY)
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
· 50%
Audi Q5 (8R)
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good towing capacity
· 44%

External Reviews

autocar[1]

Reviewer score 52% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from autocar have found:
Volvo's new mild hybrid system is available on both petrol and diesel XC60s. It adds a 48V starter motor/generator, and a battery sited in the boot can regenerate power through braking to then aid the engine under acceleration. The petrol B5’s economy of little over 25mpg on a mixed driving route that included plenty of motorway miles goes some way to limiting this car's appeal. Diesel remains a far superior option in a car of this size and weight.
Pros
  • Smooth, quiet acceleration
  • Smooth and quiet powertrain
Cons
  • Poor fuel economy
  • No automatic gearbox

autoexpress[2]

Reviewer score 65% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from autoexpress have found:
Despite the extra weight from the battery pack, the Q5 still handles fairly well. The Volvo doesn't have as much oomph from the electric motor, so the petrol engine takes more of the strain – and you hear it; it's a dronier, more vocal unit. Volvo's interior feels more individual than the Audi's, even if the tech isn't quite as slick or responsive.
Pros
  • Powerful petrol engine
  • Comfortable ride
  • Decent economy
Cons
  • Expensive for a plug-in
  • Lack of refinement

carmagazine[3]

Reviewer score 83% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from carmagazine have found:
The XC60 is a mash-up of Volvo's XC90 and V90 models. It feels just as special in here as you'd hope, with a soothing sweep of the dash which is pleasingly clutter-free. The driving position is excellent, sensibly the seats major on comfort than keeping you upright. It's pretty quiet and cruises serenely but is never short of sufficient go.
Pros
  • Sleek looks
  • Decent infotainment system
Cons
  • Slightly shrunken than XC90
  • Not the most fun to drive

cnet[4]

Reviewer score 71% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from cnet have found:
Pricing for the 2020 Volvo XC60 T8 Polestar Engineered starts at a heady $71,050. With $645 for metallic paint and $800 for the aforementioned 22-inch wheels, my tester's bottom line was $73,490. Even with its performance-oriented mission, Volvo hasn't forsaken its safety-first mantle.
Pros
  • Sensus Connect infotainment with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
  • Competitively priced
Cons
  • Limited-edition interior

References

  1. ^ Volvo XC60 B5 2020 UK review. [autocar].
  2. ^ Audi Q5 TFSI e vs Volvo XC60 T8. [autoexpress].
  3. ^ Volvo XC60 (2017) review. [carmagazine].
  4. ^ 2020 Volvo XC60 T8 Polestar Engineered first drive review: Almost Super Trouper. [cnet].

<

>

x