Compare Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Highlander 4
Variants
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft ~ 2387 L / 84.3 cu-ft
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 338 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 338 mm
Offroad | Breakover Angle
16.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
38.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R18
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Platform
TNGA: GA-K
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Size | Length
4950 mm / 194.9 in
Size | Width
1930 mm / 76.0 in
Track Width | Front
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1661.0 mm / 65.4 in
Wheel Size
18 in
18 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
64%
Pros
- Decent exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Just a clumsy hatchback
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Underpowered
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.