Compare Ford Fiesta 7 vs Lexus CT 200h facelift
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 140
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 95
1.1 70
1.1 85
1.1 Ti-VCT 75
1.5D 120
1.5D 85
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
424 kg / 935 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1420.0 kg / 3130.6 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2601 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
CO2 Emission
101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Fuel Economy
4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (combined) | 4.7 L/100km / 50.0 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
98.0 hp / 73.1 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
54.5 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
27%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Horrible to drive
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.