Compare Volvo XC40 vs Ford Escape
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.3 Hybrid
2.3 Hybrid AWD
2.3
2.3 AWD
2.3 AWD AT
2.3 AT
3.0
3.0 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
934 L / 33.0 cu-ft ~ 1835 L / 64.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Dimensions
Size | Height
1702 mm / 67.0 in
Size | Length
4394 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2619 mm / 103.1 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
17%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Quite ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No real capabilities
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.