Compare Volvo XC40 vs Hyundai Kona
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Passengers
5
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
500 mm / 19.7 in
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Powertrain
Engine
Kappa
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
21%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.