Compare Volvo XC40 vs Hyundai Kona facelift
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Chassis Type
Unibody
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/40R19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Body Style
Subcompact crossover
Colors
Sonic Blue, Phantom Black Pearl, Atlas White, Cyber Grey Metallic, Dark Knight Grey Pearl, Ignite Red, Performance Blue
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
29%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Up to 484km electric range
- Interesting Kona N
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.