Compare Volvo XC40 vs Volvo XC90
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
D3 AT
D3 AWD AT
2.5T AWD
2.5T AWD AT
T6 AWD
3.2 AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.7 m / 41.7 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
38%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good exterior styling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Pretends to be "SUV"
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.