Compare Peugeot 508 II vs Kia Optima 3 facelift
Variants
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
1.6 PSE AWD AT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi AT
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
2.0 CVVT EcoDynamics
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4750 mm / 187.0 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
44%
Pros
- Improved exterior styling
- Improved interior quality
- Low fuel consumption
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Reasonable exterior styling
Cons
- Short full-electric range
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.