Compare Ford Focus 3 vs Toyota Matrix E130
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
55%
16%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Potent engine lineup
- Fully independent suspensions
- Small turning circle
- Reliable engines
Cons
- Generic design
- No powerful engine options
- Boring design
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.