HatchbackToyota33% by Neofiliac Team

Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)

Compact Hatchback

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)Photo 1of Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)Photo 2of Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)Photo 3of Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)Photo 4of Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)Photo 5of Toyota Auris / Corolla / Blade (E150)

Product Overview

Toyota Auris (chassis code E150) is an affordable compact hatchback in production from 2006 to 2012. It was available with a range of inline-4 engines that displaced 1.3 to 2.2 liters.
A handsome little car, the Mk1 Auris combines rather reliable engines with a basic chassis and suspension setup. Toyota sells the vehicle as Toyota Blade in Japan, to which a 3.5L 2GR-FE V6 engine was made exclusively available.
Toyota has made a good effort in aerodynamics, with a decent 0.28 coefficient of drag to show for it. Another plus is the small 10.2m (33.5ft) turning circle.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 33%
Pros
  • Rather good exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • V6 only available in Japan

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
1.3
1.33
1.4 D-4D 90
1.4 D-4D Euro5
1.4
1.6 132 Euro5
1.6 132
1.6 124 AT
1.6 124
1.8
1.8 Euro5
Hybrid
2.0 D-4D 126 Euro5
2.0 D-4D 126
2.0 D-4D 90
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT Euro5

Related Products

Volkswagen New Beetle (9C) facelift
  • So ugly it's loved by many
· 22%
Peugeot 308 (T7)
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
· 18%
Fiat Bravo (Type 198)
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent, punchy engines
  • Good manual transmission
· 28%
Renault Megane II
  • Interesting engine options
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
· 16%
Kia Forte / K3 II (YD)
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
· 14%
Dodge Caliber
  • Unique design (though not pretty)
  • SRT-4
· 27%
Volvo V40
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good design from many angles
  • Good transmissions
...
· 35%
Seat Leon 3 (5F)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
· 24%
Citroen C4 Coupe
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 13%
Citroen C4 II
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Slightly better automatic transmission
· 13%
Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1)
  • Low official fuel consumption
· 8%
Chevrolet Cruze (J300)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
· 19%

<

>

x