Compare Chrysler PT Cruiser vs Volvo V40 Hatchback
Variants
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 177PS
D4 177PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
T2 120PS
T2 122PS
T2 122PS AT
T3 150PS
T3 152PS
T3 152PS AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T5 213PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T5 254PS AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Independent, spring
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
Size | Length
4369 mm / 172.0 in
Wheelbase
2647 mm / 104.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
2%
35%
Pros
- So ugly that it's an icon
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good design from many angles
- Good transmissions
- Volvo's iconic I5 engine
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Not independent rear suspensions
- Truly epitomizes ugliness
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.