HatchbackChrysler2% by Neofiliac Team

Chrysler PT Cruiser

Compact Hatchback

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Chrysler PT CruiserPhoto 1of Chrysler PT CruiserPhoto 2of Chrysler PT CruiserPhoto 3of Chrysler PT CruiserPhoto 4of Chrysler PT CruiserPhoto 5of Chrysler PT CruiserPhoto 6of Chrysler PT Cruiser

Product Overview

Chrysler PT Cruiser is an affordable compact hatchback in production from 2000 to 2010. It was available with a range of inline-4 engines that displaced 1.6 to 2.4 liters.
Unfortunately, Chrysler released what many consider the ugliest car in automotive history in its attempt to come up with something "retro". Moreover, the vehicle had a range of rather unreliable engines, and outdated automatic transmissions were used. Unsurprisingly, the PT Cruiser doesn't even have independent rear suspensions.
The interior fit and finish are horrible, as was the ergonomics.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 2%
Pros
  • So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not independent rear suspensions
  • Truly epitomizes ugliness

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT

Related Products

Dodge Caliber
  • Unique design (though not pretty)
  • SRT-4
· 27%
Volvo V40
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good design from many angles
  • Good transmissions
...
· 35%
Kia Forte / K3 II (YD)
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
· 14%
Citroen C4
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent engine reliability
· 16%
Opel Astra K / Vauxhall Astra / Holden Astra (B16)
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
· 24%
Seat Leon 3 (5F)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
· 24%
Citroen C4 Coupe
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 13%
Chevrolet Cruze (J300)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
· 19%
Citroen C4 II
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Slightly better automatic transmission
· 13%
Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1)
  • Low official fuel consumption
· 8%
Honda Civic 9 (FK)
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Sweet manual transmission
· 49%
Chevrolet Cruze 2 (D2LC)
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
· 20%

<

>

x