Compare Kia Optima vs Kia Optima 4
Variants
1.6 T-GDI AWD
1.6T-GDI
2.0
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 LPI
2.5 T-GDI DCT
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi DCT
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 PHEV
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
GT AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Electric Range
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV 70 - LEV III
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Production
Availability
2020
Made In
South Korea, USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
51%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Handsome styling
- Good handling characteristics
- Addition of DCT
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.