Compare Volkswagen Golf 8 vs Toyota Prius 2
Variants
1.0 eTSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 TSI 204 eHybrid DSG
1.5 eTSI 130 DSG
1.5 eTSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
GTD DSG
GTE DSG
GTI
GTI Clubsport DSG
GTI DSG
R 4MOTION DSG
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1210 L / 42.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.7 L / 3.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
425 kg / 937 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in | 2015 mm / 79.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1300.0 kg / 2866.0 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15, 6J x 16
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.4 sec
CO2 Emission
104 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.275
0.26
Fuel Economy
4.3 L/100km / 54.7 MPG (combined) | 4.2 L/100km / 56.0 MPG (urban) | 5.0 L/100km / 47.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
170.0 km/h / 105.6 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
1NZ-FXE
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1497.0 cc
Engine | Power
78.0 hp / 58.2 kW @ 5000 rpm + 68.0 hp / 50.7 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
52.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
115 Nm / 84.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 400 Nm / 295.0 lb-ft @ 0-1200 rpm
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Production
Availability
2020
2003 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
26%
Pros
- Rather good styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good handlding characteristics
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good fuel economy
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.