Compare Volkswagen Golf 8 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser
Variants
1.0 eTSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 TSI 204 eHybrid DSG
1.5 eTSI 130 DSG
1.5 eTSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
GTD DSG
GTE DSG
GTI
GTI Clubsport DSG
GTI DSG
R 4MOTION DSG
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.275
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
2%
Pros
- Rather good styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good handlding characteristics
- So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Not independent rear suspensions
- Truly epitomizes ugliness
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.