Compare Ford Focus 4 vs Volkswagen Golf 8 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Chrysler PT Cruiser Hatchback (2000-2010)

Ford | Cars

Volkswagen | Cars

Chrysler | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 155

1.0 EcoBoost 85

1.5 EcoBlue 120

1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT

1.5 EcoBlue 95

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT

1.5 EcoBoost 182

2.0 EcoBlue 150

2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT

ST 2.0 EcoBlue

ST 2.3 EcoBoost

ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT

1.0 eTSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 90

1.4 TSI 204 eHybrid DSG

1.5 eTSI 130 DSG

1.5 eTSI 150 DSG

1.5 TGI 130 DSG

1.5 TSI 130

1.5 TSI 150

2.0 TDI 115

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

GTD DSG

GTE DSG

GTI

GTI Clubsport DSG

GTI DSG

R 4MOTION DSG

1.6

2.0 141PS

2.0 141PS AT

2.0 150PS

2.0 150PS AT

2.2D 150PS

2.2D 121PS

2.4

2.4 AT

2.4T 182PS

2.4T 182PS AT

2.4T 220PS

2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.2 L / 6.6 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.7 L / 5.0 qt

Fuel Capacity

57.0 L / 15.1 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

112 mm / 4.4 in

Size | Width

1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1572.0 mm / 61.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1553.0 mm / 61.1 in

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.275

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability

2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score

61%

70%

Pros

Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Very low fuel consumption
Strong styling
Independent rear suspensions

Rather good styling
Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Good handlding characteristics

So ugly that it's an icon

Cons

Only available with small engines

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options
Not independent rear suspensions
Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.