Compare Toyota C-HR facelift vs Toyota Highlander
Variants
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0 AWD
3.0
3.3 218
3.3 218 AWD
3.3 232 AWD
3.3 Hybrid
3.3 Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 298 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 281 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
26.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R17 96H, 225/50 R18 95H
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1565 mm / 61.6 in
Size | Length
4390 mm / 172.8 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
54%
Pros
- Good engine reliability
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good exterior styling
- High reliability
- Very high cargo capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
Cons
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- Impractical
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.