Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Volvo XC40
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Dimensions
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
Performance
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
32%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Poor performance
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.