Compare Volvo V60 II vs Alfa Romeo 156 Crosswagon Q4
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
360 L / 12.7 cu-ft ~ 1180 L / 41.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/50 R17
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4441 mm / 174.8 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1743 mm / 68.6 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1487.0 mm / 58.5 in
Weight
1510.0 kg / 3329.0 lbs
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2595 mm / 102.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.7 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Fuel Economy
6.8 L/100km / 34.6 MPG (combined) | 8.9 L/100km / 26.4 MPG (urban) | 5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
192A5000
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
18.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.9 L / 116.6 cu-in / 1910.0 cc
Engine | Power
150.0 hp / 111.9 kW @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
78.5 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
90.4 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
305 Nm / 225.0 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged commonrail diesel inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
28%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Really, really ugly
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.