Compare DS 3 Crossback vs Volvo XC40
Variants
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1050 L / 37.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Passengers
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 47.5 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1534 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
4118 mm / 162.1 in
Wheelbase
2558 mm / 100.7 in
Performance
Electric Range
430.0 km / 267.2 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
YH01
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
32%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Ugly
- Poor performance
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor handling
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.