Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Honda Accord 9
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
2.0 PHEV
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
25%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Superb exterior styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Downgrade of suspension setup
- Wide use of CVTs
- No longer built with enthusiasts in mind
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.