Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Ford Fusion 2 facelift
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.5T AT
PHEV
Hybrid
2.0T AT
2.0T AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.7T AWD AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Length
4872 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
49%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Lots of space inside
- Overall good styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring driving dynamics
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.