Compare Mercedes C-Class Cabriolet A205 facelift vs Mercedes SLK R171 facelift
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 300 MT
SLK 300
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
285 L / 10.1 cu-ft ~ 360 L / 12.7 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2430 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Stroke
82.1 mm / 3.2 in
Production
Availability
2018 ~ 2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
74%
Pros
- Large chance to get V8 AMG in a C-Class
- Decent styling
- Last chance to get the M113-powered SLK 55 AMG
- Updated electronics
- Perhaps improved engine reliability
Cons
- Euro 6d nonsense
- 4MATIC nonsense
- Diesel nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.