Compare Mercedes C-Class Cabriolet A205 facelift vs Mercedes SLK R171
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
285 L / 10.1 cu-ft ~ 360 L / 12.7 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2430 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Stroke
82.1 mm / 3.2 in
Production
Availability
2018 ~ 2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
70%
Pros
- Large chance to get V8 AMG in a C-Class
- Decent styling
- Good SLK55 AMG drivetrain
- Sleek design
Cons
- Euro 6d nonsense
- 4MATIC nonsense
- Diesel nonsense
- Engine problems with the M272 V6
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.