Compare Mercedes C-Class Cabriolet A205 vs Mercedes SLK R171
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 MT
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 220d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 250
C 250d
C 300
C 400 4MATIC
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1409 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4686 mm / 184.5 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in | 2016 mm / 79.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1563.0 mm / 61.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2430 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Top Speed
225.0 km/h / 139.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
70%
Pros
- Possible to get C63 AMG / C63 S AMG
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent styling
- Good SLK55 AMG drivetrain
- Sleek design
Cons
- AWD nonsense in many drivetrains
- Diesel nonsense
- Some quality concerns
- Engine problems with the M272 V6
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.