Compare Honda HR-V 2 vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp AT
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d CVT
1.5 i-VTEC Hybrid
1.5 VTEC Turbo
1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT
1.6 i-DTEC
1.6 i-DTEC Euro6d
1.8 i-VTEC
1.8 i-VTEC AWD CVT
1.8 i-VTEC CVT
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
45%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.