Compare Mercedes C-class W205 facelift vs Infiniti Q50 facelift
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 160
C 180 MT
C 180
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300 4MATIC
C 300
C 300de
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Stroke
82.1 mm / 3.2 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
79%
Pros
- One V8 still available
- The buggy 7G-TRONIC is gone
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Great suspension setup
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Above average styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
- AMGs getting way over-styled
- Non-AMG cars looked generic
- 4MATIC AWD forced upon the driver
- Little improvement over pre-facelift
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.