Compare Mercedes C-class W205 vs Infiniti Q50 facelift
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63
AMG C 63 S
C 160 MT
C 180 7AT
C 180 9AT
C 180 MT
C 180d 7AT
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC 7AT
C 200 4MATIC 9AT
C 200 7AT
C 200 9AT
C 200 MT
C 200d 7AT
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC 9AT
C 220d 7AT
C 220d 9AT
C 220d BlueEFFICIENCY Edition 7AT
C 220d MT
C 250 7AT
C 250 9AT
C 250d 4MATIC 7AT
C 250d 4MATIC 9AT
C 250d 7AT
C 250d 9AT
C 300 7AT
C 300 9AT
C 300h HYBRID 7AT
C 350e PHEV 7AT
C 400 4MATIC 7AT
C 400 4MATIC 9AT
C 450 4MATIC AMG
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
92 mm / 3.6 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
79%
Pros
- Lots of power in the C63 AMG models
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Great suspension setup
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Above average styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
- Addicted to 4MATIC
- Somewhat generic styling
- Little improvement over pre-facelift
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.