Compare Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volkswagen Passat B6
Variants
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI Euro5
1.4 TSI Euro5 DSG
1.4 TSI DSG
1.4 TSI EcoFuel
1.4 TSI EcoFuel DSG
1.6 FSI
1.6 FSI AT
1.6
1.6 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
1.8 TSI Tiptronic
1.9 TDI
2.0 BlueTDI
2.0 BlueTDI DSG
2.0 FSI
2.0 FSI 4Motion
2.0 FSI AT
2.0 TDI 110hp
2.0 TDI 110hp BlueMotion
2.0 TDI 140hp Euro5
2.0 TDI 140hp Euro5 4Motion
2.0 TDI 140hp Euro5 DSG
2.0 TDI 170hp Euro5
2.0 TDI 170hp Euro5 DSG
2.0 TDI 170hp
2.0 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 140hp
2.0 TDI 140hp 4Motion
2.0 TDI 140hp DSG
2.0 TDI 140hp
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI AT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI DSG
2.0 TSI AT
3.2 FSI 4Motion
R36
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
10.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1472 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4765 mm / 187.6 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1551.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2709 mm / 106.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.281
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
55%
Pros
- Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable styling
- Fewer reliable engine options
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.