Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Chevrolet Volt 2
Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
301 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
33.7 L / 8.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
18.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4582 mm / 180.4 in
Size | Width
1809 mm / 71.2 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2694 mm / 106.1 in
Performance
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
74.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Multi-mode electric
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2019
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
26%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
- Longer range than Mk1
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.