Compare Volvo XC40 vs Peugeot 3008 II
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Length
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
21%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.