Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Ford Focus 4 facelift
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT
Capacity
Passengers
4
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Production
Availability
2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
34%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good handling
- Decent build quality
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.