Compare Peugeot 308 III vs Chevrolet Volt 2
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
301 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
33.7 L / 8.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.4 kWh (gross)
18.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4367 mm / 171.9 in
4582 mm / 180.4 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1809 mm / 71.2 in
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2694 mm / 106.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
EB2DTS
Engine | Bore
74.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric
Production
Availability
2021
2016 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
26%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Longer range than Mk1
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.