Compare Mercedes A-Class W177 vs Honda Fit 3
Variants
A 160
A 180
A 180 d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d DCT
A 200 DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d DCT
A 220 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e
A 35 AMG
A 45 AMG
A 45 S AMG
1.3
1.3 CVT
1.3 AWD CVT
1.5
1.5 CVT
1.5 AWD CVT
1.5 Hybrid AWD DCT
1.5 Hybrid DCT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
48%
28%
Pros
- Rather good design for a hatchback
- Good performance in some models
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent build quality
- Small turning circle
- Elegant design
- New 7-speed DCT
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.