HatchbackHonda49% by Neofiliac Team

Honda Civic 9 (FK)

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 1of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 2of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 3of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 4of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 5of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 6of Honda Civic 9 (FK)Photo 7of Honda Civic 9 (FK)

Product Overview

Honda Civic 9 (chassis code FK) is an affordable compact hatchback in production from 2012 to 2017. It was available with a range of inline-4 engines that displaced 1.3 to 2.2 liters.
Compared to the Mk8 Civic, the Civic 9 hatchback is only available in 5-door form. It has nonetheless a similar exterior design, though Honda regrettably thrown in some black plastic.
In other aspects, what made the Civic 8 great were carried over, though Honda increased the output of the engines.
Unfortunately, Honda got rid of independent rear suspensions.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 49%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Sweet manual transmission
Cons
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable automatic transmission
  • Extra black plastic compared to Mk8

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
1.4 i-VTEC
1.6 i-DTEC
1.8 i-VTEC 140
1.8 i-VTEC 140 AT
1.8 i-VTEC 142
1.8 i-VTEC 142 AT
2.2 i-DTEC
Type-R

Related Products

Dodge Caliber
  • Unique design (though not pretty)
  • SRT-4
· 27%
Volvo V40
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good design from many angles
  • Good transmissions
...
· 35%
Chrysler PT Cruiser
  • So ugly that it's an icon
· 2%
Kia Forte / K3 II (YD)
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
· 14%
Citroen C4
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent engine reliability
· 16%
Opel Astra K / Vauxhall Astra / Holden Astra (B16)
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
· 24%
Seat Leon 3 (5F)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
· 24%
Citroen C4 Coupe
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 13%
Chevrolet Cruze (J300)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
· 19%
Citroen C4 II
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Slightly better automatic transmission
· 13%
Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1)
  • Low official fuel consumption
· 8%
Chevrolet Cruze 2 (D2LC)
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
· 20%

<

>

x