Compare DS 3 Crossback vs Hyundai Kona
Variants
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1050 L / 37.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 47.5 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1534 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
4118 mm / 162.1 in
Wheelbase
2558 mm / 100.7 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Electric Range
430.0 km / 267.2 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
YH01
Kappa
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
21%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Ugly
- Poor performance
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor handling
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.