Compare Mercedes SLK R171 facelift vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 300 MT
SLK 300
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2430 mm / 95.7 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.37
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Reviews
Neofiliac score
74%
80%
Pros
- Last chance to get the M113-powered SLK 55 AMG
- Updated electronics
- Perhaps improved engine reliability
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.