Compare Mercedes SLS AMG Roadster vs Mercedes AMG GT Roadster
Variants
Roadster
Final Edition GT Roadster
GT Roadster
GT
GT C
GT S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
173 L / 6.1 cu-ft
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.0 L / 14.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
9.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
96 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Height
1261 mm / 49.6 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Size | Width
1939 mm / 76.3 in | 2075 mm / 81.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1682.0 mm / 66.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2630 mm / 103.5 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
308 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
0.38
Fuel Economy
13.2 L/100km / 17.8 MPG (combined) | 19.9 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
M 159.980
M 178 DE 40 AL
Engine | Bore
102.2 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.3:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 378.8 cu-in / 6208.0 cc
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
650 Nm / 479.4 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
91%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Gorgeous styling
- Great drivetrain reliability
- Good build quality
- Good performance overall
- Relatively tight and light
- Robust drivetrain
Cons
- No gull wing doors
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.