Compare Cadillac XLR vs Rolls-Royce Corniche V
Variants
XLR
XLR-V
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
125 L / 4.4 cu-ft ~ 328 L / 11.6 cu-ft
187 L / 6.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
365 kg / 805 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17 W
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1279 mm / 50.4 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4513 mm / 177.7 in
5405 mm / 212.8 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in
1910 mm / 75.2 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Weight
2735.0 kg / 6029.6 lbs
Wheel Size
8J X 18
17 in
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
3061 mm / 120.5 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.1 sec
CO2 Emission
291 g/km
Fuel Economy
19.1 L/100km / 12.3 MPG (combined) | 27.5 L/100km / 8.6 MPG (urban) | 14.2 L/100km / 16.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
225.0 km/h / 139.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
104.1 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Engine | Displacement
6.7 L / 411.8 cu-in / 6748.0 cc
Engine | Power
329.0 hp / 245.3 kW @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
48.8 hp/L / 0.8 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
99.1 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
738 Nm / 544.3 lb-ft @ 2100 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2000 ~ 2002
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
81%
Pros
- Wonderful styling
- Hardtop convertible
- As well built as any modern Cadillac
- Rear-mounted transmission
- Exceptionally luxurious
- Elegant, though dated styling
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Very high fuel consumption
- Lethargic handling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.