Compare Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Harrier 4
Variants
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Departure Angle
38.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/50 R18
225/55 R19
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4740 mm / 186.6 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
19 in
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
29%
Pros
- Decent exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Just a clumsy hatchback
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.