Compare Range Rover L322 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Variants
3.0 TD6
3.6 TDV8
4.2 V8 Supercharged
4.4 V8 299
4.4 V8 306
4.4 TDV8
4.4 V8 286
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged Euro5
5.0 V8 Supercharged
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
526 L / 18.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
29.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
25.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
13.2 m / 43.4 ft
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
4-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
225 mm / 8.9 in
Size | Height
1835 mm / 72.2 in
Size | Length
5341 mm / 210.3 in
Size | Width
2000 mm / 78.7 in | 2164 mm / 85.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
2660.0 kg / 5864.3 lbs
Wheelbase
2880 mm / 113.4 in
3295 mm / 129.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.9 sec
CO2 Emission
341 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
15.0 L/100km / 15.7 MPG (combined) | 21.9 L/100km / 10.7 MPG (urban) | 10.9 L/100km / 21.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Displacement
6.7 L / 411.9 cu-in / 6749.0 cc
Engine | Power
571.0 hp / 425.8 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
84.6 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
850 Nm / 626.9 lb-ft @ 1600 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V12 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2018
Debut
2018 Concorso d'Eleganza Villa d'Este
Made In
United Kingdom
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
92%
Pros
- Continually improved drivetrain
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Unparalleled presence
- Great luxury appointments
- Personalization
- Good performance for its size
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Many reliability issues with the drivetrain
- Horrible electrical problems
- Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV
- Very high fuel consumption
- Large turning circle
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.