Compare Renault Clio III vs Renault Clio V
Variants
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Wheelbase
2583 mm / 101.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.1 m / 121.7 ft
CO2 Emission
137 g/km
Towing Capacity
535 kg / 1179 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
19%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Decent engine reliability
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.