Compare Mazda 6 II Hatchback vs Mazda 3 BL Sedan facelift
Variants
1.8
2.0 147
2.0 147 AT
2.0 155 AT
2.0 CD
2.0 155
2.2 CD 129
2.2 CD 163
2.2 CD 180
2.2 CD 185
2.5 170
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16, 215/50 R17, 225/45 R18
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17, 7.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
49%
42%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good engine lineup
- Elegantly designed
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Unconventional shape
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hatchback version fits the car better
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.