Compare Alfa Romeo 159 vs Acura ILX
Variants
1.75 TBi
1.8
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 16V 136PS
2.0 JTDM 16V 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT
1.5 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1412 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
4660 mm / 183.5 in
4550 mm / 179.1 in
Size | Width
1828 mm / 72.0 in
1794 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
47%
18%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Gorgeous design
- Good double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
- Not GTA offered
- Unreliable drivetrain save for the 2.4L
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.