Compare Toyota Camry 6 vs Peugeot 508 facelift
Variants
2.4 158hp
2.4 158hp AT
2.4 167hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
3.5 268hp AT
3.5 277hp AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
e-THP 165
e-THP 165 AT
VTi 120 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
HYbrid4
2.2 HDi 204 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
146 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4830 mm / 190.2 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2817 mm / 110.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
19%
Pros
- Robust engine options
- Proven to be exceptionally reliable
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Slightly improved design
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.