Compare Kia Forte 3 vs Kia Rio 2 Sedan
Variants
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.5 CVT
1.6 CVT
1.6 GDI DCT
1.6 PHEV
2.0
2.0 CVT
GT 1.6 T-GDI
GT 1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Tire Size
175/70 R14
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
China VI
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
40%
10%
Pros
- Good on fuel economy
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.