Compare Kia Forte 3 vs Kia Optima 4
Variants
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.5 CVT
1.6 CVT
1.6 GDI DCT
1.6 PHEV
2.0
2.0 CVT
GT 1.6 T-GDI
GT 1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi DCT
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 PHEV
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
GT AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.9 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
China VI
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
40%
51%
Pros
- Good on fuel economy
- Addition of DCT
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.