Compare Mazda 3 BK Sedan vs Skoda Superb B6
Variants
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D
1.4 TSI
1.6 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4
1.8 TSI DSG
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI DSG 4x4
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
139 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4838 mm / 190.5 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2761 mm / 108.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
60%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Rather clean exterior styling
- Very competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
- Interesting engine lineup
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- FSI problems
- DSG problems
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.